Popular Post

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Olympic Contest Winner!

With the Olympics over and done with, it's time to tally up the points to see who was the winner of the contest!

E Daniel Clark: 11 Points
Leafies: 12 Points
Skinnyfish: 13 Points
Rich: 16 Points
Sleza: 17 Points
Kessticle: 17 Points
Will: 19 Points
Shield: 23 Points
MykeNose: 23 Points
Gooner4Ever: 24 Points
Space Weed: 24 Points
Fleet Fox: 25 Points

Congrats to Fleet Fox for owning the podium!
Shoot me an email at dennis0430 at gmail dot com to claim your prize

Thankfully, no tie-breaker was needed.

What I learned from the contest
  • Joe Thornton is in true playoff form, scoring 2 points in 7 games
  • The top 2 scorers were Marian Hossa and Pavol Demitra and nobody picked them. No respect for the Slovaks!
  • The only goose-egg pick was Lidstrom who didn't register a point in 4 games
  • Niklas Hagman is the highest scoring Finn. Now you can't say he's never done anything for the Finns, sleza!
  • Remember that offensive dynamo team from Russia? They only had one player in the top 30...
  • Canadians led the way with 13 players in the top 30, followed by Slovakia with 6 then the US with 4.
  • I LOOOVE GOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLD!!!1

Friday, February 26, 2010

STEVE COOLEY PRIMARY OPPONENT HIGHLIGHTS DIFFERENCES IN TV AD

We will let this ad, produced by one of incumbent Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley’s Republican primary opponents for Attorney General speak for itself—and simply comment that the ad highlights Cooley’s obstacles to securing the Republican nomination from unreasonable right-wing voters in the face of sensible Cooley policies (like his opposition to the 3-strikes law).


Tuesday, February 23, 2010

CONTROVERSY SURROUNDS REPUBLICAN COOLEY AS HE SEEKS TO BE CALIFORNIA’S TOP PROSECUTOR

With no household name Democrat declared in the race to fill incumbent Jerry Brown’s shoes as California’s out-going top prosecutor, the hopes of California Republican’s have been reportedly buoyed by the recent entry of third term Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley into the race for State Attorney General.

But those thinking that Cooley might trounce the ultimate Democratic nominee from the current field of six “no name” candidates for AG should think again.

Among the Democrats, Kamala Harris, 45, outpaced her opponents to collect $2.2 million last year, some it from such Los Angeles household names as Steven Spielberg and David Geffen—but Harris—who is San Francisco’s incumbent District attorney—has no chance of being elected attorney general due to her categorical opposition to the death penalty, including in a recent San Francisco case involving the cold blooded murder of a police officer---not to mention an otherwise dismal prosecutorial record in San Francisco.

But several obstacles lie in the path of liberal Republican Cooley’s swearing in as California Attorney General in 2011.

First, Cooley, who is on the left to middle side of the spectrum for a Republican prosecutor—how else could he be elected three times as district attorney in Democrat leaning Los Angeles County—must survive a Republican primary midterm election dominated by the statewide Republican faithful expected to turn out for the primary election in the greatest numbers. Can Cooley appeal to the party faithful in traditional republican strongholds like Orange County and the Central Valley while retaining his moderate cross-over appeal that assured his reelection in Hollywood? That remains to be seen.

Second, Cooley has been plagued of late with internal office dissension—leading Cooley’s deputy district attorney who oversees criminal filings for most of Los Angeles to say:

“"There is a lot of apparent acrimony between the administration and the union””, and leading another veteran prosecutor to describe the infighting in the District Attorney’s Office as a “snake’s nest”.
(Source:
Los Angeles Daily News.)

It is perhaps the former issue—Cooley’s current legal troubles regarding union allegations of retaliation and demotions of employee’s supporting unionization of the office—that provide the most likely obstacle to Cooley’s success in a general election for California Attorney General.

For example, Cooley is accused of shifting pro-union attorneys to postings a much longer commute from their homes, trimming benefits, demotions, and bad job performance reviews—all as political pay-back.

And, according to Los Angeles news sources, U.S. District Court Judge Otis D. Wright II is leaning toward a findings that Cooley committed the above charged misconduct. (Source: Los Angeles Daily News.)

"Is it just coincidence that we have experienced deputies suddenly finding themselves in Pomona or at Los Padrinos (Juvenile Hall)?" [Judge] Wright asked. "Is it just a co-inkydink?"

Should liberal Steven Cooley make it past a field of two other Republican’s in the primary election, that (among others) is question that California voters must answer on election day.
..
UPDATE—from the Recorder’s Legal Pad Blog:

http://legalpad.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/02/aghopeful-cooley-to-challenge-la-pot-dispensaries-.html

A.G.-Hopeful Cooley to Challenge L.A. Pot Dispensaries
[Cynthia Foster]

L.A. County District Attorney Steve Cooley, who recently announced his intent to run for California attorney general, may be trying to gain some political capital among conservative voters by waging war against medical marijuana dispensaries.

Cooley's office announced today that it is charging noted dispensary owner Jeff Joseph, of popular Organica in Venice, with 24 felonies related to the unlawful sale of marijuana. Cooley "warned that state law does not allow dispensaries to sell medical marijuana," according to LAT.
Joseph's case, which was intensely investigated by police and federal agents, has the potential to test whether state law permits dispensaries to sell marijuana.

A court commissioner set Joseph's bail at $520,000, which his sister and mother tearfully announced he does not have. Joseph's attorney, Eric Shevin, says that the charges are political and that Joseph was targeted due to his pot club's notoriety. Cooley's office denies these claims and says that other dispensary owners are facing charges as well.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

What's in a Name?

I got to church late tonight and I arrived during communion which was being held at the back of the church for some reason. While I was standing there, I noticed a girl who I'd met at a party the other week, we'd had a conversation about why she wasn't going to church stuff any more, and then there she was at church. So thinking it'd be good to be welcoming and affirming, as we were walking back to our seats, I said "It's Mabel* right?" I was so pleased with myself for rememebering her name. But she responded "Ahh no."

"Oh" I said "So we haven't met."

"No. I'm Gwendolynne*" she said.

"Oh sorry, I'm Tom. Well it's nice to meet you Gwendolynne." And then I sat down, feeling like an idiot.



*Names have been changed.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Toiletiquette

So I've been ruminating about my relationship with public toilets recently. Whenever I walk into a Public Toilet, if I don't see any men in there, I immediately worry that I've walked into the Women's. So I check for the urinal. If there is a urinal, I decide that I'm probably in the Men's. Though I am still a little cautious, because how am I to know if there are urinals in the women's toilets?

That said, I think I must feel pretty sure women don't have urinals because whenever I use one, I get a feeling of pride in being a man. I enjoy using urinals because it's something that only men (and drunk women) do. I stand there peeing, with my brothers-in-manhood just feeling pleased that chicks can't do what we're doing. It truly is secret men's business by virtue of the fact that women aren't built for urinals*. Women get to have babies, we get to pee against the wall.

I used to only use toilets, but now, as I become older, less inhibited and more proud to be a man, I'm using the urinals much more often.

However, as much as I love urinals, my issue with urinals is that when you go to a porcelain urinal, some are heighted and designed in a way that, if you aim incorrectly, you get splash back. And because there are so many different designs and heights for urinals for each one you have find the sweet spot for minimum splashage and it's always in a different place. Plus you have to find the sweet spot quickly or you may get an unacceptable amount of wee on your shoes, or the floor, or your leg warmers.

I think that's all my thoughts about public toilets at the moment. I know that's nothing actually to do with toilet etiquette but I wanted to used the title anyway. So stuff you, haters.



*Some people may want to argue from the implication of the sentence that urinals were built for men, not men for urinals, to which I would say "You're wrong". But still whatever the case, my point still stands, no matter who/what was built for who/what, women were not built for urinals.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Goodness

Sometimes I'll go into a shop to buy something and realise that it'd be really easy to steal it. When I pay for it rather than stealing it I'm really pleased with myself for my superior moral character.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

I am Brain

"Physicians and society are not ready for 'I have brain activation, therefore I am.' That would seriously be putting Descartes before the horse."

Neurologist Alan Ropper commenting after a study came out saying that people in a vegetative state can signal yes or no via brain imaging.

I read it in Time. I'm not really thinking much about neuroscience, I just liked the pun.