QUESTIONS REMAIN AFTER ACQUITTAL OF PERVERT SPANKING JUDGE

Opinion, by Blogonaut

If Thomas, J. regarded the 100 charges of sexual misconduct involving 16 inmates as absurd, why did he voluntarily give up his judgeship when the charges were first filed?

Testimony from the trial revealed a regular pattern of checking young black male inmates out of the Metro Jail and, at the very least, directly intervening in their cases.

Then there is the pesky fact that, according to trial forensics, semen from two inmates came to be lodged in the carpet of Mr. Thomas' special private office, where it was alleged that he paddled inmates on their bare buttocks.

As the Alabama Press Register points out in an Op-Ed piece, “the scope of misconduct in office remains disturbing — even more so now that testimony from the trial revealed a regular pattern of checking young black male inmates out of the Metro Jail and, at the very least, directly intervening in their cases.”

Also, how was Thomas, J. able for years to manipulate cases by taking them from other judges, alter rulings of other judges and, most interesting of all, personally take inmates out of jail?

The state court case is over, but do questions remain?

Remind me; what do wild boars do in the woods?
.
For more coverage of this story see here and here.