Dear David Lat:
How can you call yourself a tabloidst™ if you have never been subjected to a ridiculous lawsuit by an apparently semi-literate pro se litigant who does not have a leg to stand on, and [in our opinion] cannot plead his way out of a proverbial paper bag?
Well, it is a badge of honor.
Wear it proudly, while you enjoy the support of the rest of us in the blogging community—all of us.
Blogonaut will have more, much more, to say about this hilarious Pearson-esque lawsuit later.
In the meantime, as we stated in our initial post, “it’s a hard life for a pro per.” Let alone a PUBLIC FIGURE, pro se litigant swimming upstream from the United States Supreme Court decision in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Let alone a constitutional law professor who can only come off as less than knowledgeable in his own [self-professed] field of expertise, should he, as we predict, lose this case.
How can you call yourself a tabloidst™ if you have never been subjected to a ridiculous lawsuit by an apparently semi-literate pro se litigant who does not have a leg to stand on, and [in our opinion] cannot plead his way out of a proverbial paper bag?
Well, it is a badge of honor.
Wear it proudly, while you enjoy the support of the rest of us in the blogging community—all of us.
Blogonaut will have more, much more, to say about this hilarious Pearson-esque lawsuit later.
In the meantime, as we stated in our initial post, “it’s a hard life for a pro per.” Let alone a PUBLIC FIGURE, pro se litigant swimming upstream from the United States Supreme Court decision in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Let alone a constitutional law professor who can only come off as less than knowledgeable in his own [self-professed] field of expertise, should he, as we predict, lose this case.
Go David go!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment